Literatur

Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17, 1 – 14.

Brandtl, A., Moller, J. & Kohse-Hoinghaus, K. (2008). Was bewirken ausserschulische Experimentierlabors?  Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 22, 5-12.

Chi, M. T. H., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145 – 182.

Chi, M. T. H., & VanLehn, K. A. (1991). The Content of Physics Self-Explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1 (1), 69 – 105.

Chi, M. T. H., DeLeeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439 – 477.

Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Common sense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 161-199.

Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts' characteristics. In K.A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. (pp. 121-30), Cambridge University Press.

Clement, J. (2008). Creative Model Construction in Scientists and Students: The Role of Imagery, Analogy, and Mental Simulation. Dordrecht: Springer

Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in education research. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 9-13.

DiSessa, A. (1993), "Towards an epistemology of physics", Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105–225.

Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-Discipline Outdoes IQ in Predicting Academic Performance of Adolescents. Psychological Science, 16 (12), 939 – 944.

European Commission. (2007). Science Education NOW: A renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson L. (2003).  Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2) 393–408.

Glowinski, I. (2007). Schülerlabore im Themenbereich Molekularbiologie als Interesse fördernde Lernumgebungen. Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel.


Grabner, R., Neubauer, A., & Stern, E. (2006). Superior Performance and Neural Efficiency. Brain Research Bulletin, 69, 422-439.

Haag, L., & Stern, E. (2003). In search of the benefits of learning Latin. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 174–178.

Hardy, I., Jonen, A., Möller, K., & Stern, E. (2006). Why does a large ship of iron float? Effects of instructional support in constructivist learning environments for elementary shool students' understanding of "floating and sinking". Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 307-326.

Hardy, I., Schneider, M., Jonen, A., Möller, K., & Stern, E. (2005). Fostering diagrammatic reasoning in science education. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64, 207-217.

Hromkovic, J. (in Druck). Lehrbuch der Informatik,

Hunt, E., & Pelegrino, J. (2002). Issues, Examples, and Challenges in Formative Assessment. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 89, 73-85.

Klein, S., Roger, B., Shavelson, R., & Bolus, R. (im Druck) Learning assessment: Facts and fantasies. Evaluation Review.

Koch, A. (2001). Training in Metacognition and Comprehension of Physics Texts. Science Education, 85 (6), 758 – 768.

Mähler, C., & Stern, E. (2006). Transfer. In: D. Rost: Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (S. 782-793). Beltz: Weinheim.

Mevarech, Z., & Kramarski, B. (1997). IMPROVE: A Multidimensional Method for Teaching Mathematics in Heterogeneous Classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 34 (2), 365 – 394.

Mevarech, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2003). The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students’ mathematical reasoning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 449 – 471.

Mevarech, Z., & Fridkin, S. (2006). The effects of IMPROVE on mathematical knowledge, mathematical reasoning and meta-cognition. Metacognition and Learning, (1), 85 – 97.

Minstrell, J. & van Zee, E.H. (Eds.) (2000). Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

OECD (2007). PISA 2006: Naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen für die Welt von morgen. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.

Sadler, P & Tai, R. (2007). The Two High-School Pillars Supporting College Science, Science,  5837, 457 – 458.

Schwonke, R., Nückles, M., Hauser, S., Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2005). Computergestütztes Schreiben von Lernprotokollen. Umsetzung und Evaluation eines kognitiven Werkzeugs zur Förderung selbstgesteuerten Lernens. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 17, 42 – 53.

Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Learning Argumentation Skills Through the Use of Prompts for Self-Explaining Examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 285 – 296.

Siegler, R. S. (2002). Microgenetic Studies of Self-Explanation. In: N. Granott & J. Parziale (Hg.), Microdevelopment. Transition Processes in Development and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 31 – 58.

Siegler, R. S., & Stern, E. (1998). Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 377–397.

Staub, F., & Stern, E. (2002). The nature of teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs matters for students’ achievement gains: quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 144-155.

Stern, E. (2005). Knowledge restructuring as a powerful mechanism of cognitive development: How to lay an early foundation for conceptual understanding in formal domains. In P. D. Tomlinson, J. Dockrell & P. Winne (Eds.), Pedagogy – teaching for learning (British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II, No.3) (pp. 153–169). Leicester: British Psychological Society.

Stern, E. (2001). Intelligence, prior knowledge, and learning. In: N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.-in-Chief), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 11, pp. 7670–7674). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

Stern, E., Aprea, C. & Ebner, H. (2003). Improving cross-content transfer in text processing by means of active graphical representation. Learning and Instruction, 13, 191–203.

Stern, E., & Möller, K. (2004). Der Erwerb anschlussfähigen Wissens als Ziel des Grundschulunterrichtes. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaften, 25–36.

Wahser, I., & Sumfleth, E. (2008). Training experimenteller Arbeitsweisen zur Unterstützung kooperativer Kleingruppenarbeit im Fach Chemie. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 14, 219 – 241.

Walpuski, M., & Sumfleth, E. (2007). Strukturierungshilfen und Feedback zur Unterstützung experimenteller Kleingruppenarbeit im Chemieunterricht. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 13, 181 – 198.

White, B. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education. Cognition and Instruction, 10 (1), 1 – 100.

White, B., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students. Cognition and Instruction, 16 (1), 3 – 118.

White, B., & Frederiksen, J. R. (2005). A Theoretical Framework and Approach for Fostering Metacognitive Development. Educational Psychologist, 40 (4), 211 – 223.

Zohar, A., & Peled, B. (2008). The effects of explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge on low- and high-achieving students. Learning and Instruction, 18, 337 – 353.